Review





Similar Products

95
Miltenyi Biotec anti mouse cd206 fitc
Anti Mouse Cd206 Fitc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/CD206+Antibody%2C+anti-human/pm41888511-227-27-38
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd206 fitc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Elabscience Biotechnology cd206
Cd206, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/FITC+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pm41764506-232-16-17
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd206
Pe Cyanine7 Anti Mouse Cd206, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/FITC+Anti-mouse+CD86/10__1016_slash_j__cej__2026__174136-111-10-13
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe cyanine7 anti mouse cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech mouse anti fitc
Mouse Anti Fitc, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/CD206+Antibody/pmc12911439-68-14-23
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti fitc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Elabscience Biotechnology fitc anti mouse cd206 antibody
Expression levels of mRNAs and proteins associated with TAMs and Tregs in BPA -treated mouse tumors. ( A ) Quantification of mRNA by qRT-PCR for TAM/Treg-associated tumor-promoting factors (Arg-1, YM-1, CCL2, CCL22, Foxp3, CD25, TGF-β, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR8, CCR10) and tumor-inhibitory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS, CXCL10, CCR7). Data were normalized to 18 S rRNA and are shown relative to the model group (baseline control). ( B ) Representative immunoblots of tumor tissue for TAM- and Treg-associated proteins. Pro-tumor: <t>CD206,</t> Foxp3, CD25, PD-1, PD-L1; Anti-tumor: CD80, CD4, GITR. ( C ) Quantification of protein expression from Western blots. Values were normalized to α-tubulin, β-actin, or GAPDH as indicated. Statistical significance is denoted as follows ( n = 6): compared to the model group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Fitc Anti Mouse Cd206 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/FITC+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pmc12838707-78-30-34
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc anti mouse cd206 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Elabscience Biotechnology fitc conjugated cd206 antibody
CMA skews macrophage polarization toward M2 while attenuating M1 differentiation. (A) Chemical structural formula of CMA. (B) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with CMA (0-80 μM) for 24 h, followed by incubated with MTT (0.5 mg/mL) for 4 h (n = 5). (C) Schematic illustration of macrophage polarization mediated by different inducers. (D-F) The mRNA levels of M1 markers ( Nos2, Cd80, and Tnf ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated with CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (G, H) The mRNA levels of M2 markers ( Arg1 and <t>Cd206</t> ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with IL-4 (20 ng/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (I, J) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD80 protein levels in M1 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (K, L) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD206 in M2 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (M-O) Effects of CMA treatment on NO levels (n = 4) and cell migration (n = 3) in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data presented as mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Fitc Conjugated Cd206 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/FITC+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pmc13080821-53-42-45
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitc conjugated cd206 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Elabscience Biotechnology cd206 fitc
CMA skews macrophage polarization toward M2 while attenuating M1 differentiation. (A) Chemical structural formula of CMA. (B) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with CMA (0-80 μM) for 24 h, followed by incubated with MTT (0.5 mg/mL) for 4 h (n = 5). (C) Schematic illustration of macrophage polarization mediated by different inducers. (D-F) The mRNA levels of M1 markers ( Nos2, Cd80, and Tnf ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated with CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (G, H) The mRNA levels of M2 markers ( Arg1 and <t>Cd206</t> ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with IL-4 (20 ng/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (I, J) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD80 protein levels in M1 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (K, L) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD206 in M2 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (M-O) Effects of CMA treatment on NO levels (n = 4) and cell migration (n = 3) in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data presented as mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Cd206 Fitc, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+mouse+cd206+fitc/FITC+Anti-Mouse+CD206%2FMMR+Antibody/pm41483706-57-8-13
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd206 fitc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Expression levels of mRNAs and proteins associated with TAMs and Tregs in BPA -treated mouse tumors. ( A ) Quantification of mRNA by qRT-PCR for TAM/Treg-associated tumor-promoting factors (Arg-1, YM-1, CCL2, CCL22, Foxp3, CD25, TGF-β, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR8, CCR10) and tumor-inhibitory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS, CXCL10, CCR7). Data were normalized to 18 S rRNA and are shown relative to the model group (baseline control). ( B ) Representative immunoblots of tumor tissue for TAM- and Treg-associated proteins. Pro-tumor: CD206, Foxp3, CD25, PD-1, PD-L1; Anti-tumor: CD80, CD4, GITR. ( C ) Quantification of protein expression from Western blots. Values were normalized to α-tubulin, β-actin, or GAPDH as indicated. Statistical significance is denoted as follows ( n = 6): compared to the model group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: Cells

Article Title: Cancer Immunomodulatory Effect of Bidens pilosa L. in Mice: Suppression of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Regulatory T Cells

doi: 10.3390/cells15020126

Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression levels of mRNAs and proteins associated with TAMs and Tregs in BPA -treated mouse tumors. ( A ) Quantification of mRNA by qRT-PCR for TAM/Treg-associated tumor-promoting factors (Arg-1, YM-1, CCL2, CCL22, Foxp3, CD25, TGF-β, CXCR3, CCR4, CCR8, CCR10) and tumor-inhibitory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS, CXCL10, CCR7). Data were normalized to 18 S rRNA and are shown relative to the model group (baseline control). ( B ) Representative immunoblots of tumor tissue for TAM- and Treg-associated proteins. Pro-tumor: CD206, Foxp3, CD25, PD-1, PD-L1; Anti-tumor: CD80, CD4, GITR. ( C ) Quantification of protein expression from Western blots. Values were normalized to α-tubulin, β-actin, or GAPDH as indicated. Statistical significance is denoted as follows ( n = 6): compared to the model group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: To block Fc receptors, cells were incubated with anti-CD16/32 (Elabscience, Cat. E-AB-F0997A, Wuhan, China) for 10 min. After washing, cells were stained with PerCP/Cyanine 5.5 anti-mouse F4/80 (Elabscience, Cat. E-AB-F0995J), FITC anti-mouse CD206 antibody (Elabscience, Cat. E-AB-F1135C), and APC anti-mouse CD80 antibody (Elabscience, Cat. E-AB-F0992E) at 4 °C for 30 min.

Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Western Blot

CMA skews macrophage polarization toward M2 while attenuating M1 differentiation. (A) Chemical structural formula of CMA. (B) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with CMA (0-80 μM) for 24 h, followed by incubated with MTT (0.5 mg/mL) for 4 h (n = 5). (C) Schematic illustration of macrophage polarization mediated by different inducers. (D-F) The mRNA levels of M1 markers ( Nos2, Cd80, and Tnf ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated with CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (G, H) The mRNA levels of M2 markers ( Arg1 and Cd206 ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with IL-4 (20 ng/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (I, J) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD80 protein levels in M1 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (K, L) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD206 in M2 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (M-O) Effects of CMA treatment on NO levels (n = 4) and cell migration (n = 3) in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data presented as mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Macrophage membrane-biomimetic cinnamaldehyde nanomedicine ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease by suppressing macrophage M1 polarization

doi: 10.7150/thno.124748

Figure Lengend Snippet: CMA skews macrophage polarization toward M2 while attenuating M1 differentiation. (A) Chemical structural formula of CMA. (B) RAW 264.7 cells were treated with CMA (0-80 μM) for 24 h, followed by incubated with MTT (0.5 mg/mL) for 4 h (n = 5). (C) Schematic illustration of macrophage polarization mediated by different inducers. (D-F) The mRNA levels of M1 markers ( Nos2, Cd80, and Tnf ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated with CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (G, H) The mRNA levels of M2 markers ( Arg1 and Cd206 ) in RAW 264.7 macrophages pretreated CMA (20 μM) for 1 h, followed by co-treatment with IL-4 (20 ng/mL) for 24 h (n = 3). (I, J) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD80 protein levels in M1 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (K, L) Flow cytometry analysis and quantification of CD206 in M2 macrophages treated with or without CMA (20 μM) for 24 h (n = 3). (M-O) Effects of CMA treatment on NO levels (n = 4) and cell migration (n = 3) in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Scale bar: 100 μm. Data presented as mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: Then, the Fc receptors were blocked by treating with CD16/32 antibody (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Cat. E-AB-F0997A) for 10 min. For polarization analysis, M1 macrophages were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated CD80 antibody (Proteintech, Cat. FITC-65076), while M2 macrophages were labeled with FITC-conjugated CD206 antibody (Elabscience, Cat. E-AB-F1135C).

Techniques: Incubation, Flow Cytometry, Migration

MM@CMANP modulates macrophages polarization and enhances autophagy in IBD mice. (A-D) Protein concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and IL-10 in mouse serum were detected by ELISA assay (n = 5). (E) Representative immunohistochemical staining images of M1 marker CD80 and M2marker CD206 in mouse colon tissues. Scale bar: 50 μm. (F, G) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the frequencies of CD80 + (f) and CD206 + (g) cells gated on colonic lamina propria macrophages (F4/80 + and CD11b + ) from Control, DSS, DSS + CMANP, and DSS + MM@CMANP mice. (H, I) Quantification of the percentages of CD80 + (h) and CD206 + (i) cells within F4/80 + CD11b + macrophages. (J) Relative M1/M2 ratio (or composition) calculated based on CD80 + and CD206 + macrophage populations (n = 3). (K, L) Representative immunofluorescence images and relative quantitative statistics of autophagosome marker LC3B in mouse colon tissues (n = 5). Scale bar: 50 μm. Data presented as mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Journal: Theranostics

Article Title: Macrophage membrane-biomimetic cinnamaldehyde nanomedicine ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease by suppressing macrophage M1 polarization

doi: 10.7150/thno.124748

Figure Lengend Snippet: MM@CMANP modulates macrophages polarization and enhances autophagy in IBD mice. (A-D) Protein concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and IL-10 in mouse serum were detected by ELISA assay (n = 5). (E) Representative immunohistochemical staining images of M1 marker CD80 and M2marker CD206 in mouse colon tissues. Scale bar: 50 μm. (F, G) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the frequencies of CD80 + (f) and CD206 + (g) cells gated on colonic lamina propria macrophages (F4/80 + and CD11b + ) from Control, DSS, DSS + CMANP, and DSS + MM@CMANP mice. (H, I) Quantification of the percentages of CD80 + (h) and CD206 + (i) cells within F4/80 + CD11b + macrophages. (J) Relative M1/M2 ratio (or composition) calculated based on CD80 + and CD206 + macrophage populations (n = 3). (K, L) Representative immunofluorescence images and relative quantitative statistics of autophagosome marker LC3B in mouse colon tissues (n = 5). Scale bar: 50 μm. Data presented as mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: Then, the Fc receptors were blocked by treating with CD16/32 antibody (Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Cat. E-AB-F0997A) for 10 min. For polarization analysis, M1 macrophages were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated CD80 antibody (Proteintech, Cat. FITC-65076), while M2 macrophages were labeled with FITC-conjugated CD206 antibody (Elabscience, Cat. E-AB-F1135C).

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Marker, Flow Cytometry, Control, Immunofluorescence